Mass Tort Advertising Campaign

Paragard IUD Mass Tort Marketing & Case Acquisition

Paragard IUD litigation involves a consistent, well-documented device failure: the copper IUD's arms fracturing during removal, leaving fragments embedded in the uterus that require surgical retrieval — hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and in serious cases hysterectomy. Plaintiffs allege the manufacturers knew the device could become brittle and break on removal and failed to warn women and their physicians.

For plaintiff firms, Paragard offers what device torts prize most: a uniform failure mode, medical records that prove it, and a claimant population of millions of past and current users.

Paragard IUD at a glance

Substance / mechanism
Copper IUD
Manufacturer(s)
Teva / CooperSurgical
Associated injuries
Device Fracture on Removal
Litigation status
ACTIVE
Campaign intake
Open

The litigation landscape

Federal cases are consolidated in an MDL in the Northern District of Georgia, where the litigation has matured through discovery toward bellwether workups — the stage at which settlement posture historically forms in device MDLs. The core liability story is failure to warn: the fracture risk appears in adverse event data reaching back years before the label meaningfully addressed removal breakage.

Claim quality turns on the operative record: a documented fracture during removal, imaging showing retained fragments, and the retrieval procedure that followed. That paper trail makes Paragard one of the cleaner screening exercises in device litigation.

Who a campaign targets

Screening criteria in Paragard matters typically include:

  • Paragard IUD placement documented in medical records
  • Device fracture at or after removal — arms breaking, fragments retained in the uterus
  • Medical intervention to address the fragments: imaging, hysteroscopy, surgical retrieval, or hysterectomy
  • Claims within the applicable limitations period, generally running from the fracture and retrieval events

How MTAA runs Paragard IUD campaigns

The audience is precise: women who had a copper IUD removed and experienced complications — an experience specific enough that creative describing it screens itself. Meta's reach into women's health audiences, run with the platform-policy care that category demands, produces qualified inquiries because the fact pattern is unmistakable to the women who lived it.

MTAA's Paragard campaigns screen on the three record-provable facts — placement, fracture, retrieval — so intake files arrive ready for records requests.

Buying Paragard IUD case leads vs. running your own campaign

Most firms first see Paragard IUD offered by a vendor selling case leads or signed cases at a fixed price per case. That price bundles the advertising, the vendor's intake and the vendor's margin, and the firm usually cannot see which ad the claimant answered, what it promised, or what was said at signup.

Running your own Paragard IUD campaign turns that around. The firm pays the actual Meta media cost plus a 15% management fee, owns every signed retainer and its lead data, and can audit the ad, the landing page and the screening questions behind each claimant. When a defendant or a bar inquiry asks how a plaintiff was found, the firm has the record instead of a vendor's word.

Paragard IUD advertising cost

Paragard IUD campaign costs: MTAA does not publish a live Paragard IUD cost per signed case right now. For budgeting, benchmark it against mass tort cost per signed case by tort for comparable torts.

How those figures are produced — creative, targeting, screening and compliance — is explained in MTAA's guide to lawyer advertising on Facebook.

Mass Tort Ad Agency runs Paragard IUD campaigns on the same transparent model as every tort: actual Meta ad spend at cost plus a flat 15% management fee, a one-time $1,000 setup fee per tort, and $100 per signed retainer for CloudIntake qualification. No per-case markups and no lead resale. MTAA operates the Meta ad account and the tort-trained pixel on the firm's behalf; the firm owns every signed retainer, the claimant relationship, and its lead data, and sees spend to the dollar. Read how an MTAA engagement works.

Paragard IUD advertising — common questions

Is there a Paragard MDL?
Yes — federal cases are consolidated in the Northern District of Georgia, and the litigation has matured through discovery toward the bellwether stage where device MDLs historically develop settlement posture.
What is the core injury?
Fracture of the device's copper arms during removal, with fragments retained in the uterus requiring imaging and surgical retrieval — up to and including hysterectomy in serious cases.
What makes a strong Paragard claim?
Three documented facts: Paragard placement, fracture on removal, and the medical intervention that followed. All three live in the medical records, which makes screening and case workup unusually clean.
Is intake still open with the MDL this mature?
Yes — and MDL maturity often improves acquisition efficiency, because claimants act when resolution feels tangible. Current Paragard benchmarks are on our market data page.

Ready to run Paragard IUD campaigns?

We build, run, and qualify Paragard IUD claimant-acquisition campaigns end to end. Book a call and we'll walk you through the creative, audience, and intake plan.

Book a strategy call