Mass Tort Advertising Campaign
Roblox Child Safety Marketing & Claimant Acquisition
Roblox Child Safety litigation has moved from scattered filings into one of the fastest-developing child-protection torts in the country. Plaintiffs allege that Roblox Corporation designed a platform that gave adult predators direct chat access to children while marketing itself as safe for young users, and that the company failed to implement age verification and moderation that could have prevented grooming and exploitation. A private MDL is growing alongside a wave of state enforcement actions.
For plaintiff firms, this tort combines an expanding claimant pool, strong emotional resonance in advertising, and a defendant already settling with state attorneys general — the conditions under which early, disciplined case acquisition historically pays off.
Roblox Child Safety at a glance
- Manufacturer(s)
- Roblox Corporation
- Associated injuries
- Child Sexual Exploitation / Grooming
- Litigation status
- ACTIVE
- Campaign intake
- Open
The litigation landscape
The litigation is advancing on two tracks. On the public side, Roblox has now settled with five states — most recently a $15 million agreement with South Dakota announced in July 2026 — and has committed to mandatory age verification for all users. Those state deals do not resolve private claims; the private MDL continues to grow independently.
On the private side, new filings continue to test the platform's design-defect exposure. A July 2026 Oregon complaint alleges a predator groomed a nine-year-old girl through Roblox's built-in chat — the fact pattern at the center of this tort: platform features, not third-party content alone, enabling the harm. That framing is how plaintiffs work around Section 230 defenses, mirroring the strategy validated in the social media addiction litigation.
Who a campaign targets
Case criteria in this tort generally center on minors who were groomed, exploited, or solicited by adults through the Roblox platform. Screening factors firms typically evaluate include:
- The minor used Roblox and contact with the predator began or occurred through platform features such as chat
- Documented harm — exploitation, solicitation, off-platform contact, or related psychological injury
- Parent or guardian able to participate for minor claimants
- Conduct falling within applicable limitations periods, which several states have extended for child sexual abuse claims
How MTAA runs Roblox Child Safety campaigns
Awareness moments are frequent and powerful in this tort: every state settlement, grooming filing, and safety-mandate headline produces a spike in parent searches and social engagement. Creative that speaks to parents' protective instincts — without exploiting individual victims — performs consistently, and Meta's targeting reaches the parent demographic directly.
Because the tort is still developing, acquisition economics currently favor firms that move before broad competition arrives. MTAA has run compliant child-safety campaigns across platform torts and maintains creative and screening frameworks purpose-built for this category.
Pricing
Mass Tort Ad Agency runs Roblox Child Safety campaigns on the same transparent model as every tort: actual Meta ad spend at cost plus a flat 15% management fee, a one-time $1,000 setup fee per tort, and $100 per signed retainer for CloudIntake qualification. No per-case markups, no lead resale, and the firm owns its ad account, pixel, creative, and claimant data.
Roblox Child Safety advertising — common questions
Is there an MDL for Roblox child safety claims?
How do plaintiffs get around Section 230?
Does Roblox settling with states help or hurt private claims?
How does MTAA advertise this tort compliantly?
Ready to run Roblox Child Safety campaigns?
We build, run, and qualify Roblox Child Safety claimant-acquisition campaigns end to end. Book a call and we'll walk you through the creative, audience, and intake plan.
Book a strategy call